Raising California has moved!

You will be automatically redirected to the new address. If that does not occur, visit
http://raisingcalifornia.net
and update your bookmarks.

Welcome to Raising Califorina where you will be taken behind the scenes to peek at the lives of a Southern California family. You will have access to never before seen footage and exclusive interviews that will give you insight on what it is like to be a kid in California!


THE JOURNEY BEGINS HERE!

Gifted

Tennessee and California are gifted. The following information is provided to inform other parents and/or educators about some of the most common characteristics of gifted children. Please keep in mind that gifted children also have their own individual strengths and challenges, so they should never be painted with a broad brush. In addition to the following characterisitcs, gifted children are prone to emotional turmoil as a result of being gifted and misunderstood. There is also research in the field of giftedness that has identified a new form of giftedness called the Einstein Syndrome which will be addressed in a future blog.

Characteristics of Gifted Children
Source: Duke University Talent Identification Program


Gifted individuals may exhibit some of the following characteristics. Keep in mind that gifted individuals are not a homogenous group, and therefore, may exhibit these characteristics in varying degrees and intensities. It is not expected that a gifted child will exhibit all of the traits listed nor are the presence of any of these characteristics proof that a child is gifted.

General Intellectual Ability

Have varied interests and exhibit curiosity; strong curiosity; asks questions about everything and anything; inquisitive (Clark, 2002; Silverman, 1997-2004, Renzulli, Smith, White, Callahan, Hartman, & Westberg, 2002 ; Bloom, 1982; Terman & Oden, 1951).

Demonstrate a high level of language development and verbal ability; has extensive vocabulary; early or avid reader (Clark, 2002; Silverman, 1997-2004; Terman & Oden, 1947; Renzulli, Smith, White, Callahan, Hartman, & Westberg, 2002 ; Gross, 1993 ).

Have an unusual capacity for processing information ( Clark, 2002).
Ability to think and process information quickly; learns rapidly (Clark, 2002; Silverman, 1997-2004).

Comprehensively synthesizes problems; reasons well (Clark, 2002; Silverman, 1997-2004; Sternberg, 1986 ).

Heightened capacity to recognize diverse relationships and integrate ideas across disciplines; r easons things out, comprehends meanings, and makes logical associations. ( Renzulli, Smith, White, Callahan, Hartman, & Westberg, 2002 ).

Early use of differential patterns in thought processing ( Clark, 2002).

Is a keen observer; alert (Silverman 1997-2004, Renzulli, Smith, White, Callahan, Hartman, & Westberg, 2002 ; Rogers, 1986; Witty, 1958 ).

Specific Academic Ability

Capable of absorbing an extraordinary quantity of information with unusual retentiveness; has an excellent memory (Clark, 2002; Silverman, 1997-2004).

Able to comprehend subject matter at advanced levels ( Clark, 2002).

Has facility with numbers (Silverman 1997-2004; Gottfried, Gottfried, Bathurst, & Guerin, 1994; Hildreth, 1966; Hollingworth, 1931; Robinson, Roedell, & Jackson, 1979; Rogers, 1986 )

Has quick mastery and recall of factual information; rapid learning ability (Bloom, 1982; Hollingworth, 1942; Terman & Oden, 1947 ; Renzulli, Smith, White, Callahan, Hartman, & Westberg, 2002 ).

Unusual intensity; persistent and goal directed; perseverant in their interests (Clark, 2002; Silverman, 1997-2004; Renzulli, Smith, White, Callahan, Hartman, & Westberg, 2002 ; Rogers, 1986; Witty, 1958).

Has a long attention span; perseverant when interested (Feldhusen, 1986; Rogers, 1986; Witty, 1958).

Creative Ability

Flexible thought processes in solving problems ( Clark, 2002).

Early ability to delay closure ( Clark, 2002).

Can generate original ideas and solutions; is highly creative; offers unusual, unique, or clever answers; originality in written, oral, or artistic expression; independent thinker (Clark, 2002; Silverman, 1997-2004; Renzulli, Smith, White, Callahan, Hartman, & Westberg, 2002 ; Lovecky, 1993; Rogers, 1986 ).

Has a vivid imagination; fantasizes (Silverman 1997-2004; J. Gallagher, 1966; S. Gallagher, 1985; Piechowski & Colangelo, 1984; Piechowski, Silverman, & Falk, 1985; Terman & Oden, 1959; Renzulli, Smith, White, Callahan, Hartman, & Westberg, 2002 ).

Has a keen sense of humor; comical (Silverman, 1997-2004; Renzulli, Smith, White, Callahan, Hartman, & Westberg, 2002 ; Hollingworth, 1926; Terman, 1925; Kanevsky, Maker, Nielsen, & Rogers, 1994 ).

Is a risk-taker; adventurous and speculative ( Renzulli, Smith, White, Callahan, Hartman, & Westberg, 2002 ).

Involvement with the metaneeds of society (beauty, justice, truth); is sensitive to beauty (Clark, 2002; Renzulli, Smith, White, Callahan, Hartman, & Westberg, 2002 ).

Nonconforming; individualistic ( Renzulli, Smith, White, Callahan, Hartman, & Westberg, 2002).

Uses previously learned things in new contexts (Smutney, 1998).

Leadership Abbility

Have an evaluative approach towards self and others ( Clark, 2002).

Heightened expectations of self and others; perfectionistic; is self critical (Clark, 2002; Silverman, 1997-2004, Renzulli, Smith, White, Callahan, Hartman, & Westberg, 2002 ; Adderholdt-Elliott, 1987; J. Gallagher, 1990; Kerr, 1991; Robinson & Noble, 1991; Whitmore, 1980 ).

Advanced cognitive and affective capacity for conceptualizing societal problems
(Clark, 2002).

Are self-confident with children their own age as well as with adults ( Renzulli, Smith, White, Callahan, Hartman, & Westberg, 2002 ).

Responsible; can be counted on ( Renzulli, Smith, White, Callahan, Hartman, & Westberg, 2002 ).

Is cooperative with teacher and classmates ( Renzulli, Smith, White, Callahan, Hartman, & Westberg, 2002 ).

Tends to dominate others; directs activities ( Renzulli, Smith, White, Callahan, Hartman, & Westberg, 2002 ).

Often has solutions to social and environmental problems ( Clark, 2002).

Tends to question authority; is uninhibited in giving opinions (Silverman 1997-2004; Renzulli, Smith, White, Callahan, Hartman, & Westberg, 2002 ; Hollingworth, 1940; Meckstroth, 1991; Whitmore, 1979).

Affective/Social-Emotional Characteristics

Large accumulation of emotions that has not be brought to awareness ( Clark, 2002).

Unusual sensitivity to the feelings and expectations of others; sensitive (Clark, 2002; Silverman, 1997-2004).

Heightened self-awareness ( Clark, 2002).

Advanced sense of justice – idealism at an early age; concerned with justice, fairness (Clark, 2002; Roeper, 1988; Rogers, 1986; Silverman & Ellsworth, 1980 ).

Earlier development of internal locus of control ( Clark, 2002).

Unusual emotional depth and intensity; shows compassion; sensitivity (Clark, 2002; Silverman, 1997-2004; Piechowski, 1979, 1991; Webb, Meckstroth, & Tolan, 1982; Torrance, 1977; Dabrowski, 1972; S. Gallagher, 1985; Piechowski & Colangelo, 1984; Whitmore, 1980 ).

Strong need for consistency between values and personal actions ( Clark, 2002).
Advanced levels of moral judgment; morally sensitive (Clark, 2002; Silverman, 1997-2004; Gross, 1993; Hollingworth, 1942; Passow, 1988; Roeper, 1988; Silverman & Ellsworth, 1980; Terman, 1925 ).

Strongly motivated by self-actualization needs ( Clark, 2002).

Psychomotor Characteristics

Unusual quantity of input from environment through a heightened sense of awareness ( Clark, 2002).

Unusual discrepancy between physical and intellectual development ( Clark, 2002).

Has a high degree of energy (Clark, 2002; Feldhusen, 1986; Whitmore, 1980).

References
Adderholdt-Elliott, M. (1987). Perfectionism: What's bad about being too good? Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit Press.
Bloom, B. S. (1982). The role of gifts and markers in the development of talent. Exceptional Children, 48, 510-521.
Clark, B. (2002). Growing up gifted (5th ed.) Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
Dabrowski, K. (1972). Psychoneurosis is not an illness. London: Gryf.
Feldhusen, J. F. (1986). A conception of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 112-127). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gallagher, J. J. (1966). Research summary on gifted child education. Springfield, IL: Office of the Illinois Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Gallagher, J. J. (1990). Editorial: The public and professional perception of the emotional status of gifted children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 202-211.
Gallagher, S. A. (1985). A comparison of the concept of overexcitabilities with measures of creativity and school achievement in sixth grade students. Roeper Review, 8, 115-119.
Gross, M. U. M. (1993). Exceptionally gifted children. London: Routledge.
Hollingworth, L. S. (1926). Gifted children: Their nature and nurture. New York: Macmillan.
Hollingworth, L. S. (1931). The child of very superior intelligence as a special problem in social adjustment. Mental Hygiene, 15(1), 1-16.
Hollingworth, L. S. (1942). Children above 180 IQ Stanford-Binet: Origin and development. Yonkers-on-Hudson, NY: World Book.
Kanevsky, L., Maker, C. J., Nielsen, A., & Rogers, K. B. (1994). Brilliant behaviors. In C. J. Maker & A. Nielsen. Principles and curriculum development for the gifted. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Kerr, B. A. (1991). A handbook for counseling the gifted and talented. Alexandria, VA; American Association for Counseling and Development.
Lovecky, D. V. (1993). The quest for meaning: Counseling issues with gifted children and adolescents. In L. K. Silverman (Ed.), Counseling the gifted and talented (pp. 29-50). Denver: Love.
Meckstroth, E. (1991, December). Coping with sensitivities of gifted children. Paper presented at the Illinois Gifted Education Conference, Chicago, IL.
Passow, A. H. (1988). Educating gifted persons who are caring and concerned. Roeper Review, 11, 13-15.
Piechowski, M. M. (1979). Developmental potential. In N. Colangelo & R. T. Zaffrann (Eds.), New voices in counseling the gifted (pp. 25-57). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
Piechowski, M. M., & Colangelo, N. (1984). Developmental potential of the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 80-88.
Piechowski, M. M., Silverman, L. K., & Falk, R. F. (1985). Comparison of intellectually and artistically gifted on five dimensions of mental functioning. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 60, 539-549.
Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L. H., White, A. J., Callahan, C. M., Hartman, R. K., & Westberg, K. L. (2002). Scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students (Rev. ed.). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
Robinson, N. M., & Noble, K. D. (1991). Social-emotional development and adjustment of gifted children. In M. C. Wang, M. C. Reynolds, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.). Handbook of special education: Research and practice, Volume 4: Emerging programs (pp. 57-76). New York: Pergamon Press.
Robinson, H. B., Roedell, W. C., & Jackson, N. E. (1979). Early identification and intervention. In A. H. Passow (Ed.), The gifted and talented: Their education and development (pp. 138-154). The 78th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Roeper, A. (1988). Should educators of the gifted and talented be more concerned with world issues? Roeper Review, 11, 12-13.
Rogers, M. T. (1986). A comparative study of developmental traits of gifted and average children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Denver, Denver, CO.
Silverman, L.K. ( 1997-2004). Characteristics of giftedness scale: A review of the literature. Retrieved April 25, 2005 from www.gifteddevelopment.com/Articles/Characteristics_Scale.htm
Silverman, L. K., & Ellsworth, B. (1980). The theory of positive disintegration and its implications for giftedness. In N. Duda (Ed.), Theory of positive disintegration: Proceedings of the third international conference (pp. 179-194). Miami, FL: University of Miami School of Medicine.
Smutney, J. F. (Ed.) (1998). The young gifted child: Potential and promise, an anthology. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triarchic theory of intellectual giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 223-243). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 1. Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1947). Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 4. The gifted child grows up. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1951). The Stanford studies of the gifted. In P. Witty (Ed.), The gifted child (pp. 20-46). Boston: D. C. Heath.
Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1959). Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 5. The gifted group at mid-life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Torrance , E. P. (1977). Discovery and nurturance of giftedness in the culturally different. Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
Webb, J. T., Meckstroth, E. A., & Tolan, S. S. (1982). Guiding the gifted child: A practical source for parents and teachers. Columbus, OH: Ohio Psychology.
Whitmore, J. R. (1979). Discipline and the gifted child. Roeper Review, 2(2), 42-46.
Whitmore, J. R. (1980). Giftedness, conflict, and underachievement. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Witty, P. A. (1958). Who are the gifted? In N. B. Henry (Ed.), Education for the gifted, (pp. 42-63). The fifty-seventh yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Reprinted with the permission of Duke University. © 2008 Duke University Talent Identification

No comments: